Comment: Actually, he's not

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: They are both truther sites (see in situ)

Actually, he's not

And right there is why some "truthers" lose credibility: making (ironically enough) false statements to support an argument does nothing but hurt one's case.

There's a difference between wanting a new investigation (which he wanted), and saying it was a government cover up and/or false flag (which to my knowledge, he has never said).

Whether it actually *is* a coverup/false flag...I'm honest enough to say I don't know what the truth is, but I know when I'm being lied to.

A signature used to be here!