Comment: Ha ha, yeah, we wouldn't want to taint the jury pool.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Have you heard... (see in situ)

Ha ha, yeah, we wouldn't want to taint the jury pool.

But we know for a fact that these guys were radical jihadists right? Cause the news told us.
They also told us that the bombings were the work of right wing tea party activists protesting tax day.
They also said that they robbed a 7-11, but they didn't.
They also said that they were throwing grenades at the police, but they weren't.
He drove over his brother, the police drove over his brother, he escaped on foot, he escaped in a car, he wrote praise Allah inside the boat, what with a sharpie?
Please let me know where the line tainting the jury begins and ends, because that is not a valid reason for not posting the video. The trail has already been conducted, and the court of public opinion has been rendered. In the words of our Constitutional Scholar President.

One thing we do know is that whatever hateful agenda drove these men to such heinous acts will not -- cannot -- prevail.
That's why we relentlessly gather the facts. That's why we have courts. And that's why we take care not to rush to judgment -- not about the motivations of these individuals; certainly not about entire groups of people.

nice save Barry