Comment: Maybe

(See in situ)


I was a little harsh in my assessment, but it was an honest assessment from the feeling I got from reading your post.

"I never suggested the accused did not commit these crimes, only the fact the complaint as written did not provide convincing proof they did the bombings."

Is that not conjecture there? Where are you deriving that statement from? You are guessing from the statements in the complaint that they don't have evidence that they very well may have, we don't know yet. That is exactly what conjecture is. I think it has been well proven here on the DP that what constitutes as convincing proof is an opinion.
Sorry if I misinterpreted your intentions but I just don't see any reason whatsoever to doubt their guilt, especially when they apparently aren't even claiming innocence.