Comment: Ever heard of stray bullets?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Because (see in situ)

Ever heard of stray bullets?

But anyway that's beside the point. People are criticizing Rand as if he's advocating something unconstitutional. The use of drones may be unwise for various reasons, such as the potential for "collateral damage," but it is not in itself unconstitutional or a violation of anyone's rights. Whether the use of drones is legitimate or not depends entirely on HOW they're used - as with any other weapon. Rights can be violated just as easily with a gun, a sword, a baseball bat, etc. The technology itself is not the problem.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."