The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: I agree that is what he said,

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: the statement posed (see in situ)

I agree that is what he said,

I agree that is what he said, but I do believe he didn't articulate it correctly. I hope he clarifies this.

Update: "My comments last night left the mistaken impression that my position on drones had changed.

Let me be clear: it has not. Armed drones should not be used in normal crime situations. They only may only be considered in extraordinary, lethal situations where there is an ongoing, imminent threat. I described that scenario previously during my Senate filibuster.

Additionally, surveillance drones should only be used with warrants and specific targets.

Fighting terrorism and capturing terrorists must be done while preserving our constitutional protections. This was demonstrated last week in Boston. As we all seek to prevent future tragedies, we must continue to bear this in mind."

-Rand Paul

All you haters, settle down

A nation of sheep breeds a government of wolves.