The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: As explained above...

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: You realize that that is a (see in situ)

As explained above...

I completely understand that it is the person that is flawed, but who is doing the study and the person reading it, is it not a person(s)?

Peer review studies are very good I agree, problem is that it can in some instances become "censorship by the main stream", we have several defectors in Europe that have dropped out from the UN (Climate Panel) because they say they do not follow the scientific method yet the majority signs on to it to get it "peer reviewed".

In a world without factors from outside the scientific method can be done scientifically correct, but in our world it can be done as propaganda as well, to be blind to this is very dangerous.

Teach a man to fish and you feed him for the rest of his life.
Teach a man to phish and he'll clean out your bank account.