I think his analogy was wrong to use. I don't want any drones ever used but what if there is an imminent threat to civilians that can't be stopped say for instance a terrorist with a bomb in a train headed into a large city? You would have to use some type of strike against the train whether its a F-1 fighter plane or a drone. Sending a drone to attack a person holding up a 7-11? Nonsense.
If this ever happens and innocent bistanders are killed, drones will be outlawed in a matter of minutes.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: