Comment: I agree with judge nap

(See in situ)

I agree with judge nap

I also think rand was implying that the person is shooting the gun, so the person is guilty. Rand's point is that a city or state has the right to emply whatever power within the constitution to stop crime, but the president does not have the power to use drones to assasinate Americans because he suspects them of walking out of a store with $50 stolen dollars waving a gun.