It was Sue Benford, who came to discover what she did in 1997 and eventually presented a paper on her findings, co-written by her equally non-credentialed husband. It's true that not all scientists have accepted her findings. As stated in the film, the primary reason her work was dismissed was because... she wasn't a scientist. Among the naysayers were a couple members of STRP (the Shroud of Turin Research Project), the group of scientists granted a week to study the shroud back in 1988, at which time the carbon dating was done. But later, well... I wouldn't want to give it away. It's a great story!
Discovery Channel - Unwrapping The Shroud of Turin New Evidence http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyiZtagxX8
P.S. It's not that anyone claimed the carbon dating itself was incorrect. The issue was: of what relevance is the dating of a section of the shroud proven to have been patched?
When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner,