Since you know you'll look like a paranoid freak, a fabricator, and an ad hominem junky, I love how you avoided actually calling me some sort of government hack and instead just posed it as a "question."
That's pretty slick, especially coming from someone who's drank so much Kool Aid that they can't tell the difference between facts and theories.
Just to make it clear, and ensure that these words penetrate your tin foil hat and sink into your little brain: I, and many others, who represent a majority of the liberty movement and the country at large, dispute your falsely labelled "facts" and do not consider your THEORIES to be accepted dogma within this movement. Accordingly, the THEORIES you present here about 9/11, chemtrails, the NWO, the reptilians, and other assorted topics, are not consensus liberty movement issues and should not be promoted as such.
Do you agree with our goals of smaller government, less war, responsible foreign policy, monetary reform, personal freedom, and the like? If so, do you agree that those issues take priority over spreading your THEORIES? If you do, it's time to stop using this movement as your playpen for conspiracy THEORIES. If not, it's time for you to be exposed as a hijacker pretending to be part of the liberty movement.
Make your choice.
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul repre