Comment: substitute

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Ugh (see in situ)

substitute

"This is just opening up the door, once we all accept "constitutional use" of guns in our country, it's just a short step to unconstitutional use. Let's get real here, if there are people with guns walking around your house, how do you know if they're violating your constitutional rights? You won't see them when they're concealed under a coat, even if you see one how will you know it's legal and the person carrying it isn't a criminal? I don't see any reason to have fully automatic, scary killing machines on our streets. It's not ok, it's not constitutional because there is no way for us to know if our constitutional rights are being violated or not. I'm already uncomfortable with the idea of people carrying guns. There is absolutely NO USE for domestic use of military style assault weapons. This is America!!! We're supposed to be the "land of the free". I'm not misunderstanding what Rand Paul is saying, he's not misspeaking. I know exactly what he's saying, and I don't agree."

That pretty much sums up any retort i might have made.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."

Click Here To See The Candidates On The Record