Comment: And?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Ron Paul quote: (see in situ)

And?

Well that's it then, huh? After all, if Ron Paul said it, then that's it; no further discussion allowed. For liberty!

I can already see it now: every time someone points out anything about Rand, no matter how valid, the "b-but Ron Paul says you're trying to divide!" card is going to be played.

Like I've said, I see nothing "wrong" with supporting or not supporting Rand, and the only division that's being created is by the people who bicker endlessly over how pro-person is this and how anti-person is that. It's no different than the red team/blue team nonsense that so many here claim to despise.

A signature used to be here!