Comment: My problem with this.

(See in situ)

My problem with this.

What about those of us who do, in fact, find factual problems in the various theories? For instance, in my view, 9/11 was blowback that government failed to prevent either through mind-numbing incompetence or allowing it outright, but I don't believe they actually had an active hand in creating the attack - that is, they didn't intend it.

Does that make me a "cognitive infiltrator?" See, there's the issue. The premise appears to be that if anyone thinks there are factual problems, that proves they're a paid infiltrator. Not only does it discourage debate, this premise is also simply unfair by not *allowing* someone to disagree, or else they're an "infiltrator."