Any criticism to be "stabbing in the back"?
If Rand Paul makes statements that are clearly not libertarian, should those statements not be challenged, even if Rand truly is "Trojan Horse"
In fact, if the Trojan Horse Theory is true, then criticism of his positions as non-libertarian should actually *help* him "trick" those neocons into voting for him, shouldn't it?
*Advancing the Ideas of Liberty Daily*
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: