Comment: This has already been addressed by our laws

(See in situ)

This has already been addressed by our laws

You stated:

"What I said is that a state prosecuting a crime is not "suing" in the name of another. And that it doesn't have to find a specific "victim" for there to be a crime. Nowhere did I say they can't or don't assess civil penalties."

You forget (or never knew) that this has been addressed in our law already:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..."

It is clear that you do not realize where this statement came from and why it is there. It has its roots in divine law. The divine right of kings was not just about being born into royalty. Divine law is all about liability. The king accepts full liability for he and his subjects kingdom. This is why there are repugnant concepts in our organically construed common law as opposed to English Common Law. The mock trials came from the crown being the accuser claiming the chain of liability but in reality held none. This was a logical failure for fair justice because it meant that only one side held liability; the accused. By recognizing the equality of all men (again men and women) created equal meant that that divine right was strictly construed into our geographical jurisdiction as applicable to all men and women. Again divine law is one of liability so one is liable for knowing the law and exercising their divine right, ignorance of the law is no defense. By stating the consent of the governed for the lawful powers of justice in congruence with divine right of equality thereby, through divine providence of divine law, that equality brings liability with it. We ended the kingdom in order to have a freedom where all held equal liability for their own actions for the very purpose of maintaining logical congruency within all law. The strict construction of organic law applicable thereby severed those aspects of English Common law by declaring them repugnant to true enlightenment of real law.

Sure, there where just as many chuckleheads and corrupt men back then as their is now proportionally. And yes corrupt men are constant and ever persistent in their tyranny. But the question is are we each willing to swear upon the alter of God eternal hostilities to all forms of tyranny over the minds men or not. Are we going to be real men who stand within divine providence and exercise rightful, lawful and just exercise of the protections of law or not? Are we going to let two-bit lowlife corrupt tyrants implement all their tools and machinations of theft, torture, murder, and control upon us or are we going to bring justice to all who commit crimes against anyone seeking just remedy. Is it going to be equal justice under the law or the state dictating a reality that unlawfully enriches them at the expense of EVERYONE?

You idiots think that people seeking justice is some kind of terrorist. You are thoroughly brainwashed.

As far as strict liability goes notice how strict liability popped into existence in our "law" in the years following the 14th amendment. Do you think that would have anything to do with the unlawfully ratified 14th amendment "person"/"citizen of the United States"? Hmmm? Do ya think? Maxim addressing the 14th amendment and all derivations of code applicable to this "person"

No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent

Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent

A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null.

Laws violated in making the 14th amendment
Article 5 amendment process
Article 3 section 3 Levying War against the People

They have been operating on the basis that no one would figure what they did and that they could use their word magic of the person to confuse everyone into consenting to their own tyranny. Yes this is the inescapable divine law unfolding before our very eyes. We were ignorant of the law and the tyrants took over. That is the only thing that has really happened. We forgot Law.

I feel sorry for you if you can't see how beautiful the law actually is. It has the ability for us to wake up and use it at anytime because of its logical nature and know matter how much precedent has been set for repugnant concepts. In fact it can even have a parallel existence to it. If people who are ignorant of law get tyranny but those not ignorant of law get protection then the fact is that both realities can exist at the same time and both are lawful due the very source of order of the universe called divine law. In natural law this essentially the quantum mechanical wave function collapse that happens upon perturbation, in Common Law this is the "facts of the case", In our organic law this is consent of the governed, in the Constitution it is We the People, In Statutes, this is the "person". Are we there yet? There is a logical congruency already there based on the facts of the case.

What facts are you going to use to collapse the wave function. I ask very strategic questions that get them to admit to their criminal activity on the record. I seek logical conundrums that are essentially conflicting logical check mates in law to expose their corruption. There are MANY of these. I have perfected this so well that I can even get very predictable motor response functional responses out of them. I am using the records I obtain to build the cases slowly but surely upon every act of crime they commit against me. Their tyranny is not sustainable to an awake and aware population this is a fact of the case.

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...