Comment: No that is not what I said.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Flinging... (see in situ)

No that is not what I said.

I said you are "Bitcoin equivalent of the fiat lovers who mock the sound money advocates." This is no way implies that you are a lover of fiat, but that you mock Bitcoin in the same way that they mock gold and silver. I was comparing the attitude.

You are correct that there are "defects" with bitcoins. No shit. There are also problems with gold and silver. Many of their problems overlap. This does not mean both or either are illegitimate. As I have stated before, and so have many others, bitcoins are a supplement to gold and silver.

Weebles you have a dishonest streak in you when it comes to debating. It seems to me that your aversion to crypto-currency is more rooted in emotion than logic.