Comment: Wow.

(See in situ)


Natural rights don't have an age exclusions. The right to life, liberty, and property does not begin at 18 years. The NAP does not exclude humans who have not yet completed their 18th year.

It is unbelievable to me how the NAP could be interpreted like this. If anything, a small person, just like a women, is more fragile and should be treated with softer kid gloves.

There are lots of ways to teach. Violence is an archaic method with unintended consequences. It is baffling to me that a self-professed libertarian, generally deep thinkers, could conclude that violence on children is 'right'.