Comment: Understand this...

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: What is wrong with lending (see in situ)

Understand this...

There is a big, big difference between voluntary usury (seeking a loan and paying interest to a 2nd-party by choice), and mandatory usury applied to the mere creation and existence of all money.

The latter is what makes the Rothschilds Central Bank model a form of enslavement, and tyranny, and systematically indebts any Nation on that system.

Ben Franklin was referring to the fact that the old "Colonial Script" was interest-free money that the private Bankers had no power over (they could not create it). It could only be created by the government transparently and this was done with no cost to the public (no debt generated).

When The Bank of England (similar to today's Federal Reserve Central Bank) took over and outlawed the "Colonial Script", then the only legal tender was their "dirty money" ... money that by design costs money to create. Central Banks indebt and enslave Nations because they are the ones, and not the elected government, who create and control all the money in existence -- and they do so as a profiteering scheme (usury) for themselves (to enrich themselves at the expense of the Country).


So there is nothing wrong with having voluntary loans at interest (lending, a.k.a. usury) using otherwise "honest money" in circulation (money created without indebting all the public).

But there is something totally corrupt about having all the money be rigged such that the mere creation of money also creates debt. This is because, then the more money that you create...the more debt you also create -- and the sum of the entire Money Supply in circulation cannot possibly expunge the debt. So more money is created....and then more debt... It's a catch-22. A Ponzi Scheme. Fractional Reserve Lending is also a further distortion that expontially corrupts the money supply, and leaves the Country in a state of unresolvable Debt.

As Ben Franklin correctly points out, after the "Colonial Script" was so successful, The Bank of England swooped in and stomped it out -- leading to the American Revolution which this Country really lost because despite driving the army away, ....privately-owned (Rothschilds) Central Banks followed anyway. We won the "war", but lost our Independence.

And when Lincoln tried to do escape the clutches of the International Bankers with government-issued Debt-free "Greenbacks" this is what the Rothschilds "London Times" had to say:

"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt.

It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America.

That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

-- The London Times responding to Lincoln's Greenback debt-free currency

Lincoln was assassinated.

Finally, Kennedy was the last President to attempt to go around the Central Bank (E11110), and we all know what happened there too.

Now you see why I don't celebrate the 4th of July.
We Lost!!