Comment: Yep

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: More Sophistry (see in situ)

Jefferson's picture


you caught us. We had to resort to "sophistry" because you are obviously baffling them with your BS.

Your counterargument is about the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling LALLALALALALLA.

Do you care even to try and explain the video I posted showing sequential squibs going up the side and top corners of WTC7?
Do you care to dispute the WTC construction manager's explanation of a redundant design?

Do you even understand what the word "redundant" means as it applies to structural engineering?

How about taking a stab at explaining WHY WTC 7 fell for 2.3 seconds at freefall as ADMITTED by NIST? (after they changed their story 5 times)

You've jumped the shark and landed in clownsville with this ridiculous OP. Your absurd arguments make me either question your sincerity, or your intelligence.