Comment: The only conclusion from alleged "freefall"

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Yep (see in situ)

fireant's picture

The only conclusion from alleged "freefall"

is resistance was minimal for the duration of the alleged freefall. Alleged because none of the measurements take into account the measuring point actually was falling away from the camera. To immediately jump to the conclusion minimal resistance can only mean CD, prior to a thorough examination of all the evidence and what may have contributed to the speed of descent is intellectually sloppy at best, and bigoted at worst.
Debris evidence, that being very large, multi-story panels of perimeter wall, suggest lower sections indeed broke apart, which would have reduced resistance to essentially zero.

Undo what Wilson did