Comment: "committed to moving the Republican Party toward isolationism"

(See in situ)


"committed to moving the Republican Party toward isolationism"

>Could someone committed to moving the Republican Party toward
>isolationism really win the presidential nomination?

It would be so incredibly comical (were it not so incredibly serious) how the MSM abuses terminology. This is clearly no accident. This is an outright hit piece.

>Not since 1980 has the conservative movement successfully nominated
>one of its own.

Notice how they don't mention that it was Reagan - the guy everyone in the GOP supposedly idolizes.