The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: This statement is ambiguous.

(See in situ)

This statement is ambiguous.

I am one of Rand's biggest critics here on DailyPaul, but I'm not jumping to any conclusions.

The way the statement is worded could mean either:

A. Boston demonstrated that we need to be more protective of our consitutional rights when fighting "terrorism".


B. Boston demonstrated that the police work was consistent with protecting constitutional rights.

I think it is more likely that he means A.

But, I will say one thing for sure.

Anyone here who thinks he means B and approves of it because they think Rand is "playing the game", is hopelessly lost.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at

"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard