Comment: It doesn't need to be valid contract.

(See in situ)


It doesn't need to be valid contract.

Rights are taken, not given IMO. You want to get philosophical and say they are endowed by a creator or come from some natural law, then perhaps there is an argument for that, but in the end Rights belong to those that actually take them and maintain them. A king need not give such rights for them to exist, and they may not exist even if he does. The Magna Carta has importance not because it was a contract that the govenrment is suppose to honour, but because it articulates the importance of the Rule of Law and the need to stop arbitrary power.