which should be the number one issue for libertarians, as we all know nothing grows the State like war. However, his economic views are dismally Hamiltonian, so it would be hard for me to support him. Rand Paul, on the other hand, is hard to pin down on anything, as he never expresses any principles. However, he is certainly less anti-war than Pat, which is a huge minus. Frankly, I couldn't get too excited about either of these guys and if this were the choice, I would simply abstain from beans.
“With laws shall our land be built up, but with lawlessness laid waste.”