Comment: Hmmm, food for thought

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I think you're right (see in situ)

Hmmm, food for thought

I've in the past conjectured along the same lines you just mentioned, but had forgotten the long debated fraud known as a Birth Certificate.
Having his illegality to even hold or be eligible to hold the office, that he took through fraud, would necessarily mandate a intensive discussion upon the repeal of the whole of law, executive orders and regulations implemented under his tenure. That of course would be unacceptable to the Globalist Elite, who have adroitly worked behind the scenes to carefully implement, step upon step the framework for their eventual takeover of the world, America being the last and final bastion of freedoms to overcome to do so.
Considering the controlling force that has to date so well hidden itself in plain sight, it's unlikely that the BC will ever come to be the keystone of Obama's demise: it has far to many consequences that inhibit the schemes already in place, it's therefor not reasonable to expect that force to use a method of removals that would injure its own goals.
I think that there is something, more along the lines of martial movements against Americans in general, or against specific segments . But rather than being directed at the target of " conservatives, tea Party, patriot " as we are now seeing WERE targets, I expect a strong movement in the Overton Window of public appeal as a backlash to these scandals, swinging very hard right into hereto unconscionable arenas , specifically laws leading to the creation and enforcement of an American National Religion. Thus being by cause a knee jerk reaction to the socialist policy, and progressive agenda of these last few administrations, a perfect storm. It is a classic Hegelian dialectic, thesis ( pseudo Christian conservative put into crisis against ANTI-THESIS the morally bankrupt socialist/ progressive untill such drama causes the desired SYNTHESIS a National region for a Nation built upon that very concept being anathema. They can name a seemingly innocuous religion " Christian ", thereby stating they are not favoring a singular specific religion, as there are over 1600 different Christian religions at present. In essence it is the Clintonian, " please define " is ", on a grander scale.

Just musings.

God Bless

Drew, by the very grace of GOD through the blood of Christ Jesus.
"there shall come after us men whom shall garner great wealth using our system, and having done so shall seek to slam the door of prosperity behind them." George Washington