Comment: From Nick Gillespie:

(See in situ)

From Nick Gillespie:

"In Paul’s defense, there is nothing rhetorically inconsistent between the senator’s CPAC and Cedar Rapids comments. Paul has long preferred to call himself a constitutional conservative rather than a libertarian and, as my Reason colleague Mike Riggs has pointed out, he has never actually embraced pot legalization, even at the state level. Instead, Paul “wants to keep everything illegal, but institute gentler penalties.”"

People didn't know what Rand's position was, just lazy projections of what they wanted him to be.!/Agonzo1