Comment: No, he is not.

(See in situ)


No, he is not.

He advocates limited government, which has to be funded by taxes, and all taxation, however minimal, violates the NAP.

Note that I'm not criticizing Ron, I'm criticizing your definition of
"libertarian," which is so narrow as to exclude both the leader and the majority of the members of this movement. By your definition, only the anarcho-capitalists would be libertarians.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."