Comment: BECAUSE EVERYONE IS

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Why do you think Adam is a (see in situ)

BECAUSE EVERYONE IS

INCLUDING YOU FOR ASKING THAT QUESTION AND ME FOR ANSWERING IT

This article contains a sprinkling of facts mixed in with a hearty helping of assumptions.

Take this gem at the end of the article for example: "(ps. if you want to really find Adam Astroturf Kokesh, I would suggest looking at all the 3 diamond and above hotels in the area. He’s bound to be holed up in one of them with his “oppressors” probably downstairs at the bar trying to pick up chicks with his “big muscles” tank tops and a copy of his father’s latest bank statements.)"

Seems to me like the writer is awfully sure about his claim, yet hasn't actually bothered to check these hotels himself.

"Libertarian candidate Don something" Don "Something"? Wow, some real investigative reporting, there.

Would I rule out the possibility that this arrest was planned to a degree? Of course not, but that article is a waste of bandwidth.

Overall, this piece comes off a very sloppy attempt to spin a series of wild speculations into facts. all my 1s

A signature used to be here!