Comment: I consider 'Obvious' an ad hominem because:

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Uhhh (see in situ)

I consider 'Obvious' an ad hominem because:

It's implied that the person on the other side of the debate can't understand or recognize the 'obvious'. That is a attack on a person's critical thinking abilities. There may be a more specific term for this kind of logical fallacy, but I place it in the ad hominem category.

Sure regular posters use ad hominem & straw man arguments too, but they're the predominant arguments of cointel pro and military intelligence. I like how you used the word 'idiot' to describe me in explaining your arguments. Clever.

Glad to see you following this thread EricHoffer. Weren't you on the BP HOAX thread? Didn't you take the time to make a video about that? I was trying to explain this whole ACTOR and HOAX theory back then. Yes ACTORS.. on TV or videos or Youtube videos. What's the latest? Oil still sinking in water? The gulf still a global disaster or people eating good ol' Gulf crawfish these days?

Good morning to y'all in military intelligence. It might make you feel good to get some air and plant something in the ground to grow sometime. Clean air and sunshine is good for the body and spirit. I'm trying to learn to grow food myself. Maybe you guys should try it sometime. Cheers.

9-11 Media Fakery: Did anyone die on 9-11?

9-11 Actors:

Pysops.. media.. actors.. propagandists... disinfo agents.. fake videos.. fake photos