Comment: It's not

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I think animals do have (see in situ)

It's not

It's not an issue I've given much thought to previously either, and really the purpose of "Mondays with Murray" is to communicate Rothbard's point of view on a subject, not necessarily state it as my own, though of course I usually agree with him.

I asked above, but if an animal has the same natural rights as a human, how can keeping a "pet" be justified? Would it be ok to keep a human pet? Feed, care, provide for them, but not allow them to leave?
*Advancing the Ideas of Liberty Daily*