It's not an issue I've given much thought to previously either, and really the purpose of "Mondays with Murray" is to communicate Rothbard's point of view on a subject, not necessarily state it as my own, though of course I usually agree with him.
I asked above, but if an animal has the same natural rights as a human, how can keeping a "pet" be justified? Would it be ok to keep a human pet? Feed, care, provide for them, but not allow them to leave?
*Advancing the Ideas of Liberty Daily*
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: