Comment: Are Actual Words of the Bill Constitutional?

(See in situ)


Are Actual Words of the Bill Constitutional?

as in it is the "constitutional responsibility of Congress to authorize the use of military force" http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c113:2:./temp/~c113YUu... :

[Struck out->] (8) urges that, if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense, the United States Government should stand with Israel and provide diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence. [<-Struck out]

(8) urges that, if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in legitimate self-defense against Iran's nuclear weapons program, the United States Government should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with United States law and the constitutional responsibility of Congress to authorize the use of military force, diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence.

Also says:
"Whereas, on October 27, 2005, President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for a world without America and Zionism; "

in addition to a bunch of "whereas" statements.

So, my question, did the President of Iran really call for a world without America?

My question to my Friends of Liberty, We don't stand for a world without America, do we?

I suppose you could say a mouse is in my pocket, but it seems like people are upset that the senate voted this way. I am trying to understand why, so instead of just looking at the vote rollcall, I looked at the Senate Bill.

Forgive my ignorance, but what exactly is wrong with it? I see the words "should stand" and I see the words "congress authorize military force."

Is this bill authorizing that force? Or is it saying congress "should" authorize that force, if that force "legitimately" becomes necessary because Iran's presidents supposedly wants to wipe America off the map?

And then I wonder, what exactly does "legitimate self-defense against Iran's nuclear weapons program" mean?

...

...