Comment: I am not saying

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: ((Where I live doesn't have (see in situ)

I am not saying

that those type of crimes (what are conspiracy crimes, to illegally enter the U.S.) aren't true in some cases. And I don't live in Texas or Arizona, so my opinion isn't based on firsthand experience. I'll partially default to you on that.

But the fact remains, the class-action was filed on behalf of legal U.S. citizens who'd been profiled and harassed by a racist sheriff's department, no matter if that department's "intention" was good.

Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Being a person of a certain race, who others of that race are, or possibly have been, committing crimes, is not reasonable grounds. And that's why Arpaio had the judgement not in his favor.