Comment: no it doesn't, because that's exactly what I did

(See in situ)


Joη's picture

no it doesn't, because that's exactly what I did

I don't understand how you can just claim otherwise, I've clearly shown it to be so. You're now claiming more unique data would come from less, which is impossible on its face.

And I very explicitly said one is not "making it a photo with more megapixels" by enlarging it. The image editor is just interpolating the pixels between, unless one has a picture so dense it has subpixel data, which this one doesn't. So please drop the wholly disingenuous claim that it's coming from a 16 megapixel camera just because an iphone picture was enlarged.

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?