a traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or hero or event, with or without a determinable basis of fact or a natural explanation, especially one that is concerned with deities or demigods and explains some practice, rite, or phenomenon of nature.
That's the definition I was using. One can argue that Evolution is "conjecture" or "theory" or "flat out wrong" or "a scam", but that doesn't make it Myth versus Science. It is an attempt to explain the natural phenomena that we observe using the Laws of Nature without resorting to supernatural intervention.
As for "miracles", no such list has been presented. Instead, what has been presented is doubts about the likelihood of events presented by the theory. (Origin of life from non-life, speciation, age of the Universe, etc.) The validity of such doubts, or lack thereof, doesn't make Evolution any less or more scientific.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and