Comment: BTW one point I want to make about 'probable cause'...

(See in situ)

BTW one point I want to make about 'probable cause'...

The fourth amendement:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

'Probable cause' doesn't give authorities any right to do anything to you when they stop you. Remember 'probable cause' is necessary to obtain a warrant via Oath or affirmation and that's all the Constitution says. Any search or seize is unconstitutional without a warrant even if there is 'probable cause'. Technically, any government authority even with probable cause should have to go to a court to obtain a warrant before doing anything. All stops are really unconstitutional, but the lower courts have been broader in their interpretation so they've allowed some exceptions for law enforcement. (A lot of standard police actions and lower court decisions can be challenged in the Supreme Court, but the establishment doesn't want that so I think those in power try to brush things under the rug and keep cases from getting to the Supreme Court.)

Instead of mentioning 'probable cause' I would just ask: 'Do you have a warrant? and stick to the bread and butter phrases: 'Am I being detained/ Am I free to go' ..

9-11 Media Fakery: Did anyone die on 9-11?

9-11 Actors:

Pysops.. media.. actors.. propagandists... disinfo agents.. fake videos.. fake photos