Comment: Mentioning duels

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: With all due respect (see in situ)

Mentioning duels

is only about showing how precedent has been subverted. If long standing precedent can be overturned by a small cabal of criminal men seeking to manipulate and control precedent for their own advantage then the whole process of precedent is out the window and anything goes within "policy" regardless of any precedent.

Going to a "court" when "charged" with a "crime" without an actual accuser facing you and being liable for any false accusations is like playing a football game with only one team. The fundamentals of the process are inherently broken through criminal usurpations by corrupt men who seek power over another without any liability for their own actions. A criminal action with no accuser who has a valid cause of action demonstrating alleged actual injury is a mock trial.

The precedent for "mock trials" being repugnant to law has already been addressed in our organic laws and is enumerated as a form of unlawful tyranny. You seem to have missed the whole concept of our laws of self-governing.

Those who seek equity must do equity...

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...