Comment: Voted down probably because your are wrong.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: HWHA?!? (see in situ)

Voted down probably because your are wrong.

Partially wrong anyway. I know this because I met with ACLU attorneys over my son wearing a "Legalize Marijuana" shirt at school. IF the speech is disruptive to the learning processes THEN it can be restricted.

The case you should look at is Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. It was decided by the Supreme Court in 1969.

Even though the ACLU was willing to take the case we chose not to move forward with it because the lawyers felt it likely my son would be surveilled. At 15 I didn't feel I could ask him to make that sacrifice.