Is that adviser a member of The Bar Association and is membership in The Bar Association an important consideration when seeking generous help from Friends of Liberty in the fight against Tyranny?
If it is sound, reasonable, important, wise, knowledgeable, and affordable advice in defense against Tyranny by Tyrants to have an accurate account of what happens when Tyrants Target Victims, then that hold true in each case?
FBI arrives and interviews a target.
Get a record, get a witness, make sure that no information is offered to the FBI, at all.
Any information offered to the FBI will be information used to injure the targeted victim.
If that is true, which sounds very reasonable, or at least worthy of further, accurate, Federal Bureaucracy Investigation by any potential victim, then how about using the same advice on any member of The Bar Association?
Union Lawyers, or members of The Bar Association, are members of one Monopoly Source of Legal Advice according to False Federal Laws, which are demonstrably false, if you care to look.
Union Lawyers, from The Bar Association Monopoly, contract with people in Federal Commerce and therefore those contracts are subject to Federal Regulations, which, as may be the case, or not the case, in any case, are wavers of rights, assumed to be wavers of rights made by members of The Bar Association, and unknown as wavers of rights made by those who are contracting with members of The Bar Association.
Who has rights that can, or cannot, be waved?
So, knowing may be better than being ignorant, and therefore knowing that liars may assume that someone looking for help in the fight against Tyranny is someone waving their rights, and therefore someone looking for help in the fight against Tyranny ought to consider having a durable record, with witnesses to help keep a record recorded, whereby it is expressed in no uncertain terms that no Friend of Liberty ever gives up inalienable rights.
Is that unclear?
If it is unclear to anyone, that no Friend of Liberty ever willfully gives up any inalienable rights, then what is the problem?
You, please, tell me.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: