Comment: Power of lies

(See in situ)

Power of lies

I think that your ideas are flawed, false, and dangerous to life on Earth.

Rights of mankind are genetically factual and advantageous, up to a point at which other genetic mutations, which are disadvantages to the species, whereby those individuals born with those genes remove the rights of mankind, an internal power struggle within the human gene pool.

Rights of man (human conscience) versus might makes right (barbarity, savagery, self-destructive stupidity)

In other words the concept of rights is a genetic advantage, or adaptation (positive mutation over time) whereby the individual examples of the experimental species has the power necessary to reproduce and survive despite the extreme dangers that threaten survival of the species.

Rights are merely manifestations of those genetic modifications from simple life to complex life that allow the individual examples of the human species the capacity to cooperate and through cooperation the power to survive, as a species, is increased to a much greater power compared to species that have not developed the power of cooperation on the level at which the human species has grown.

Unfortunately there are other mutations in the genetics of mankind that have not been positive and those unfortunately dangerous mutations counteract the positive mutations, which are called adaptations, and therefore what exists is a species killing virus within the species genetic pool that can be called the non-cooperative genetic mutation, or the crime gene.

Rights are the labels people put on the manifestations of those genetic adaptations that afford the human species the power to cooperate, and therefore adapt, and therefore survive, against power that would destroy other species less capable of the level of adaptation, invention, production, complexity, commanded by individual human beings cooperating with other individual human beings.

There are very few examples of human being that are capable of expressing the type of behavior that are expressed by the negatively mutated versions of human beings. Those who are identifiable, genetically, physically, mentally, as sociopaths, or psychopaths, or narcissists, or nihilists, are those born without the genetic adaptations that are called names that identify them, such as a human conscience. Absent the genetic makeup that includes a human conscience there are examples of human beings not driven to cooperate, and the opposite drive is expressed by these examples, they destroy for fun and profit.

If you wish to learn more about this then I suggest reading Erich Fromm's book The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, or Robert Lindner's book Prescription for Rebellion, or even Howard Bloom's work in both The Global Brain and The Lucifer Principle.

Anyway, the concept of rights is a shared genetic adaptation which produces a method by which individual members of the species are born with the capacity to cooperate and in so doing the power of each individual to adapt to conditions of life that would otherwise destroy less capable life forms is enhanced by that power to cooperate whereby the total power of the human species is much greater than the sum of the individual examples of humans combined.

In other words, a multi-planet species, if ever one does exist, has to overcome specific limitations that limit the power of that species to adapt.

If life requires random movement of life forms to travel from one planet to another planet, then there is, unfortunately for life, not much power in that crap shoot.

Mankind has already traveled to the moon, and mankind could not have done so if all of us were criminals, having no conscience, having no power to even think about cooperating, where each human example is ever ready to slit each others throats at the slightest sign of weakness, for fun or profit.

Mankind has already managed to send communication devices to Mars.

The power to gain such advantages over rats, roaches, and lower forms of life are afforded by those genetic adaptations, those genetic advantages that are manifested in such words as human rights.

If you do not understand that then you may be fooled into thinking that the criminals in power are the one's who give, or take away, human rights, and that is a species killing error called foolishness, or stupidity, or Absolute Abject Belief in Falsehood Without Question, or gullibility, or some other word that describes how that weakness is manifest in our time because too many of us have been fooled by those too few of us who are genetically destructive.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

"We" means those who accurately identify how human rights are inside us when we are born. "We" does not mean those who are born without human rights inside them when they are born. Criminals do no recognize human rights, how can they, they are not born with human rights? They are born without the power to "step inside another person's shoes," and they are born with the power to torture and murder someone else who has made shoes cooperatively, and that is how they earn their way through life, they destroy, that is what they do.

Those who are born without any capacity to acknowledge human rights end up claiming that they own everyone else, inevitably, so it may be time to stop allowing those criminals to send such wisdom down the memory hole so often, at least stop paying them so well for each innocent person tortured and murdered.

Common Sense tells us, in history, to stop paying the criminals so well for lying so much, and threatening so much, and torturing so much, and destroying so much.

Stop making crime pay so well, please.

"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer."

Invest heavily in liars who lie, torturers who torture, and serial killers who murder, and other bad things, and what do you think will happen?

You might be fooled into giving up your conscience and therefore your power to acknowledge human rights?