I believe it was the Supreme Court of Canada that stated that "a right is a claim recognized by law". I would suggest that the law of nature (physics, animal instinct, etc) is different from natural law. I would suggest that natural law is objective logical deductive reasoning, void of emotion / prejudice with an eye towards human dignity and respect. Natural law, distinct from Law of Nature, might equally be called Common Law.
Natural Rights, I would suggest, are a product of Natural Law. In the absence of thinking, in the domain of Law of Nature, rights do not exist... There is no right or wrong, but thinking makes it so...
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: