The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Fine print

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Here's my Motto! (see in situ)

Fine print

The most obvious example of inculpatory evidence is the actual words spoken by the Usurpers before the Usurpation.

Before diving in to the most obvious examples of inculpatory evidence it may be a good idea for me to acknowledge that The Bill of Rights exemplify the fine print attached to the Usurpation in such a way as to offer a way out instead of absolute dictatorship being the rule without exception.

That is a report made by people who were at the closed door secret meetings that became known as The Constitutional Convention. There was a Gag order placed on the attendees so the report came out too late.

That record includes additional quotes from one of the main characters Usurping Liberty which worked as Liberty in the form of 13 Republics Voluntarily joining (or un-joining), and Voluntarily paying for (or not paying for) a Democratic Federated Republic.

The concept of democracy was not Mob Rule as exemplified by how The Articles of Confederation worked as the 13 States formed a MOB or not a MOB voluntarily and the only reason for forming a MOB was to Defend against attack by criminals with armies, such as the army of criminals then known as The British or The Red Coats or Taxation without representation Gang, or the Central Banker Frauds.

I saved (bookmarked) these from Reclaiming America:

"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "n countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.

"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."

If you read the first book offered by Robert Yates on The Secret Proceedings, then the second book offered in this offering of order of reading by me, where the second book is offered by a modern day writer who also wrote this in that book in those Resolutions offered by Madison and Jefferson in the failed attempt to save the VOLUNTARY Union.

"Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.

Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government,the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely."

In other words the Central Banker Monopolist Monarch Frauds can't have their Monopoly Money Power if there is competition, so they remove the Voluntary, or Free Market, aspect of Government and usher in, Usurpation, or Crime made Legal, also known as Obey without question any order, and there is no "or else," you will pay one way or the other.

A very good comparison, to prove the point, was proven by that comparison between the events that became known as Shays's Rebellion and The Whiskey Rebellion; whereby Shays's Rebellion occurred under Voluntary, Free Market, Government Design (not perfect but working as designed) and the later version of similar events occur under The Usurpation known as The Constitution Fraud.

One professional Extortion racket not 13 wanabe Extortion rackets where the slaves are protected in their power (or rights) to move from state to state under The Articles of Confederation and then under The Constitution no such power exists, and that deal was called The Dirty Compromise.

Slaves were not of one color, slave masters are all of one color, whatever criminal color is in fashion.

Red or Blue these days?

More sources:

The Constitutional Convention was falsely called into being on the false claim of needing to adjust the Voluntary Union, when the real, hidden, idea was to Consolidate (no longer Voluntary) the States (Republics) into ONE Dictatorial Power - proven fact.