> I think that a better way to explain liberty is through the non-aggression principle.
Yes, but that works only as long as people don't ask you to define precisely what constitutes aggression.
I would posit that you cannot define aggression without reducing to natural rights.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators