I agree 100% that the concept of communal rights is a contradiction in terms. I was merely pointing out that the step from assuming no rights exist to a world of communal rights is faulty because the one does not follow from the other.
use: the employment of a good towards an end
Use of something does not imply the right to use it. If I own a car and you steal it from me, you have the ability to use it but not the right.
If there are no rights, then there is no moral restriction to using any thing as you see fit. This does not mean you get to decide what the restrictions are on any thing, which is the situation implied by communal rights.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may