Comment: She was under oath, made a statement, ASSERTED HER INNOCENCE

(See in situ)


She was under oath, made a statement, ASSERTED HER INNOCENCE

then decided to "plead the 5th" to not allow anyone to cross-examine her.

This is not someone who got pulled over on the highway. This is a woman who had very expensive legal council, paid for by our tax dollars, weeks of notice that she was to testify, and probably got to and from the court house in a chauffeured car will full security detail (paid for by our tax dollars).

Most importantly she is a PUBLIC OFFICIAL being questioned about her actions while in the official capacity of serving WE THE PEOPLE.

WE THE PEOPLE deserve a cross-examination of her statements of innocence.