Comment: yeah

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Probably because it was (see in situ)


It is psudo science. He's embracing a personal opinion and philiosphy and then passing it off as legitamate words with very clever language.

It's not about questioning things, it's about putting down a theory or science based not on evidence but just because he didn't like it.

The world is round. Well I don't think it is round, I say it isn't round, I think it is square, why should I have to say it is round, why shouldn't it be square? I am going to say it is square and flat and because I said it cleverly that makes it a good argument.

No science is an exact science anyway it doesn't pretend to be - it's only what we currently know at this point in time, what we currently believe to be the fact at the time. It doesn't mean we aren't free thinking.