Comment: that's funny

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: very strange to the reporter (see in situ)

that's funny

I don't view comments from non lawyers about legal process to be too informational.

And as to this issue, I can think of testy exchanges with judges as to both sides occurring in most cases I have been involved with. She is able to inquire as to whether he is testifying, and by doing so at that time she was just rying to keep the case moving. To me, the purpose is fine, the motive is fine for the questioning, and there was just one aspect of it that is a little over the line, but nothing that could not be cured the next time she visited the issue. Other than that, there are just personality and style issues.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein