Comment: Now it would just be bunny stomping.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: this is one of the dumbest (see in situ)

Now it would just be bunny stomping.

You're really out of your league here. I don't know if you're capable of learning or not, but if you care to do so you need to stop writing and start reading.

Here's another quote you will probably not understand either but it describes your situation clearly.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion - John Stuart Mill

You don't understand what you are arguing against. This is why your critiques are incoherent. Even if we assume your poor grammar, punctuation, etc are just laziness, you still just plain don't know what you're arguing against. At this point we must assume this laziness runs to intellectual laziness as well. Or else you would take the time to figure out what the hell you are arguing against.

As such you are really hurting your cause, especially with the emotional emesis you spewed. I'm serious when I say I've met Maoists who make better cases for Statism. Hell I can make the Maoist case if I want to. I could certainly make an argument for statism better than you have been.

You're passionate. You're in a liberty forum. Maybe you're smart, but we won't be able to tell until you know what you're talking about, or arguing against.

So maybe you could be a fighter for the cause of good. And it would be almost impossible for you to make a poorer fighter in the cause for evil than you have been.

But whether you want to stay on the side of evil, or explore good, the first step is stop being lazy and learn.