the article isn't false because it doesn't claim that these places have no government.
and you did exactly what i said you would do. anywhere with a violent gang (somalia) is government according to you. a continental icecap is govt according to you, because a neighboring state might claim a part of it.
of course there are people in the world who will potentially use violence. that's human nature. if that's your definition of government, than obviously absence of it is not realistic.
besides, you guys are supposed to believe in protection agencies. why don't 100 of you hire a protection agency and settle in an uninhabited place. if some state or gang bothers you, your crack protection agency should have it covered. isn't that the magic of freedom?
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul r