Comment: Two factors to incitement: Imminence AND Lawlessness.

(See in situ)


Two factors to incitement: Imminence AND Lawlessness.

if the govt proves the video tape post and the subsequent AJ show proves imminence they get that factor.

IMHO ADAM WINS LAWLESSNESS.

The SCOTUS already ruled the District Codes absolute ban on weapons a violation of the second amendment. Therefore, the legislative acts to control Adams behavior constitution a Bill of Attainder, and is therefore procedurally void and should be dismissed.

If somehow the judge is an idiot and cannot see the obvious circumvention by code enforcers and the legislature of D.C. (congress) of the judiciary then STILL, Prosecutors will NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE THE CODE ENFORCEMENT IS SUPERIOR TO CASELAW, and Adam should be found not-guilty by a grand jury.

Problem is Adam, by paying more attention to maritime law, didn't know he had to interject, not remain silent, soas to object to the lack of subject matter jurisdiction the federal government claims it has when in fact it does NOT!

These criminal charges deserve a trial in the original jurisdiction that claims authority to arrest Adam for his behavior, so that Code Enforcement Authority itself has to prove it did not violate Adams rights.

The fact a subject matter of which is not federal is being resolved in a federal forum is a matter of undue course and, THIS IS THE KICKER

COULD THE FEDS BE USING ADAM TO SET UP CASELAW AGAINST GUN SPEECH IN ALL LOCAL DISTRICT FORUMS, REGARDLESS OF SUBJECT MATTER???! BECAUSE OTHERWISE THIS CASE IS WITHOUT STANDING

A true flower can not blossom without sunlight and a true man can not live without love.