Comment: if a broken nose is evidence

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: We do NOT know... (see in situ)

if a broken nose is evidence

if a broken nose is evidence someone was acting like a thug, then how is a dead body not?

that's the whole point. only those two know what happened. he gets the reasonable doubt for sure. but its not like people are dumb for questioning the way it was handled.

older guys who dont look like drug dealing rappers are never thugs, and young kids who dress in hoodies are? you have NO evidence trayvon wasn't defending himself just as much as zimmerman was, but just happened to be unarmed, and winning the fight. NO evidence. except for a stereotype.

and i meant carrying, not literally holding, sorry. and he did call him a punk, just not to his face.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRaDD4WH_u0